lenses aren't good, right?
For US$300, D70 purchasers can get a zoom lens that goes from wide to moderate telephoto. Everyone wants to know if it's worth the money.
Here it is mounted on the D70. As you can see, this makes for a rather compact kit (compare this to the photo on the 17-55mm review page).
elements in 13 groups; 1 aspheric, and 3 ED elements.
focus override, AF-S lens focusing motor, internal
67mm filter size. Comes with HB-32 hood. Focuses to
90mm long from mount (110mm extended), 13.5 ounces (390g).
One of the surprises with the D70 announcement was that it could be purchased for US$300 more with a wide angle to telephoto zoom lens. Having a kit lens for consumer camera isn't new for Nikon, but a closer look at the specs showed this was an AF-S lens, an ED lens, and a DX lens. Ver-ry inderesding, as they used on Laugh In.
The immediate question everyone asks is if an inexpensive lens that comes with the camera can be any good. I'll say you from scrolling down to the performance section: yes, beyond your expectations with one exception. But before we get to the details, we need to over some...well...details.
Once again we have to talk about what DX means. All of the current (as I write this) Nikon DSLRs (plus the Fujifilm DSLRs) have a sensor that's smaller than a 35mm frame. It's often referred to as APS size, as it's very close to the frame size of that now mostly forgotten film type. To wit, the 35mm frame is about 36mm across the long axis, while the Nikon DSLRs are all about 24mm across the long axis. That means that any 35mm Nikkor lens has an image circle that is far bigger than is necessary on the DSLRs. The DX series lenses are designed with an
image circle more appropriate to the smaller sensor size of the
digital lineup. Essentially, these lenses are designed solely
for use on Nikon DSLRs (and the Fujifilm DSLRs). The advantage of a DX lens is that it can be smaller and lighter than a lens of similar specifications that needs to cover the full 35mm frame.
I write this, four DX lenses have been announced:
the 17-55mm f/2.8G , the 10.5mm full
frame fisheye, the 12-24mm f/4G AF-S, and the subject of this review, the 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5G AF-S. I expect we'll see additional DX lenses as time goes by.
first thing you notice about the 18-70mm DX lens is that it's rather small. Indeed, a magician with a modest-sized hand could probably make it disappear before your very eyes just by palming it.
||From left to right: the 17-55mm DX, the 12-24mm DX, and the 18-70mm DX (D70 kit lens). This should give you some idea of just how small the 18-70mm really is.
18-70mm focal range gives you angle of views from ~19 to 66 degrees
(horizontal) on a DSLR; it's effectively the same as using an 28-105mm lens
on a 35mm body. For some users, that's a stay-on-camera range. There's
no denying that this is a popular and much-asked-for focal length
range. Indeed, even I find it interesting to walk around with this, the 10.5mm, and the 70-300mm ED lens on a D70--that makes for a very compact, light kit that covers a pretty incredible focal length range. Still, I would have loved for it to be 16-70mm--I miss that little bit extra at the wide end.
is a two ring design; like most recent Nikkors, the zoom ring is the frontmost ring and the focusing ring is closer to the camera. Yuck. The lens does have a distance scale, but
with no depth of field or
markings. You know, even if the lens manufacturers don't want
to give us complete depth of field markings, the least they could do
the hyperfocal point at one useful focal length and aperture combination.
In the case of the DX lenses, this is even more important, as
standard 35mm depth of field charts won't help you; you need
one designed specifically for the APS-sized sensors (copies of
which are in my DSLR books, by the way). On the left side of
the lens (from the back of the camera) is
Focus button: In the M/A position the lens
works as usual (autofocus with manual override). In the M
position, the lens focuses only manually.
HB-32 hood supplied with the lens is the bayonet type butterfly
style. It can be reversed onto the lens for carrying, but it adds
significant diameter to lens when you do so. It's pretty shallow, so doesn't present a lot of shading for the front element, but it's better than nothing. The lens itself uses 67mm filters, an odd size for Nikon and one that'll force almost everyone to buy a step-up ring of some sort (I use a 67-77mm step up, as my primary filter set is 77mm, but if you use the 70-300mm with this, you'll want to use 67mm filters and get a 62-67mm step up for the telephoto zoom).
get AF-S focusing with this lens, and that'll take you down to
1 foot and a couple of inches (.38m). The supplied lens cap is the
new pinch-front type.
Handling is not the strong point of this lens.
The zoom ring is quite stiff and not at all fluid (as I've used my lens and moved it in and out of dry environments, it has a bit of a "catch" in the middle of the zoom range). The barrel extends an inch and a half at 70mm, so you're moving a far amount of plastic and glass in the zoom. The barrel also rotates slightly during zoom, which means that you may need to readjust filters. The focus ring is actually pretty decent (as are all AF-S focus rings), though it's thin and has nothing to distinguish it from the zoom ring other than position. Remember, the focus ring is not in a "normal" spot, and this takes some getting used to if you're coming from the standard 35mm Nikkor lenses.
Focal length changes slightly when you're shooting at close distances. As with most modern lenses, you should be focusing after framing, so I don't see this as a big deal.
The 18-70mm is small and light and balances on the front of a D70 very nicely. On bigger cameras, such as the D2h, it just disappears. But either way, I felt comfortable. Even though it's small and relatively light, there's enough mass here to keep even the heavy bodies in balance.
I alluded to it before, so let's cut to the chase: on almost every performance parameter this is an excellent lens. The lone exception is vignetting.
is excellent throughout the range, with f/8 being the
point of maximum
sharpness on my sample pretty much across the entire focal length range.
Even at f/3.5 (or 4.5 at the tele end) in the corners this lens remains an very good performer--much better than you'd expect for the price.
I'd be more comfortable about using this lens wide open if it weren't for the vignetting, but if you're a Capture user and shoot NEF, you can safely ignore that comment, as Capture's Vignette control handles this lens perfectly.
By f/5.6 there
really aren't any big issues to worry about, though vignetting is still partially present. Chromatic aberration is well controlled, though not quite as good as the 17-55mm DX, especially at the wide end.
Images taken with the 18-70mm are sharp and contrasty. Nikon is really showing that they can design excellent consumer zoom lenses lately. Both the 24-85mm AF-S and this lens reveal that a low-cost lens doesn't have to skimp on optical performance.
falloff is, as mentioned, the big performance issue with this lens. It's present and obvious wide open (even at the telephoto end), and it extends to some degree for at least for two full stops. Whether this is a deal breaker for you is something you'll have to decide. I'm often filtering and post processing to darken corners of images, so I'm not as upset about this problem as some photographers. Especially so as I rarely shoot with a lens wide open. Stopped down to f/8 or beyond, vignetting really isn't an issue with this lens.
Put the 18-70mm on an F5 and it becomes obvious why the lens has light falloff: the image circle is small (hey, it's a DX lens, what did you expect?). There's no point at which this lens covers the full 35mm frame, unlike the other DX zooms Nikon has produced. The image circle is smallest at 18mm, gets slightly bigger around 50mm, then starts getting smaller again. This exactly matches the vignetting performance I see on the D70. 50mm is about the best focal length in terms of light falloff, 18mm the worst, with 70mm somewhere in between. Note too, that light falloff is best at infinity focus and gets worse as the focus pulls in.
a JPEG image taken at 70mm and f/8. The top version is a complete view of the frame, the bottom a 100% crop of part of the frame. Since you're going to ask, yes, the bottom has some sharpening in it (the camera was set to low), but as you can tell from the lack of halo, it's minimal.
In the 100% crop, you can actually see that the ISO 400 noise and stairstepping on edges due to the 6mp sensor size is competing with the detail captured. In short, for virtually any D70 user, you're going to find yourself bound by the contraints of the camera, not the lens. Looking critically at the image, I'm also focused just a bit behind where I'd normally want to be (the far valley wall is crisp, the nearest Zabriske "folds" are ever so slightly soft--I'd rather have that reversed). (And no, this isn't a D70 back focus issue--I simply goofed. This was a quick grab shot while I was working with workshop students. I think I was trying to demonstrate something at the time to someone.)
performance is very good. At both ends there's measurable distortion (barrel
at the wide end, pincushion at the telephoto), but it's low in
amount and not as obvious as we've seen in some other Nikkor
designs. This isn't an architectural lens, but it's far from a fun-house
is very fast and mostly hunt-free. As I noted in my 17-55mm review, the primary focus speed difference between that lens and the 18-70mm comes in terms of the maximum aperture and in low light. In bright light, both a very sure and fast. In low light, especially at the telephoto end, the 18-70mm starts to lag, as it's just not letting as much light hit the autofocus sensors.
performance is quite good except for direct into the sun. Unless
light is hitting directly on the front element, I've not seen
degradation. Unfortunately, the supplied butterfly type hood doesn't do a perfect job of keeping light from hitting the front element. If the light source is directly in the picture, things get a
little wonkier, and you're likely to see contrast reduction if
not ghosting. That's typical of virtually all modern zooms, though.
I'm still evaluating bokeh, but my initial impressions are mostly favorable (the lens features a 7-blade aperture diaphragm).
Vignetting is back.
We'd forgotten about it when we moved to digital SLRs, as the older lenses had much larger image circles than necessary, but with a small DX lens that barely covers the APS-sized sensor, it's back.
- Variable aperture.
The big issue is that at 70mm this is an f/4.5 lens, which means that autofocus in low light can be compromised slightly. Still, not a big issue, though a negative one.
- Build quality. Build quality doesn't exceed the price point.
- Excellent optics. Other than that vignetting, no flaws worth mentioning, actually. Considering the price, superb performance.
- The 28-105mm for the digital world. Yes, the mid-range zoom is back in full force. If that's what you want, this is the lens to get.
- Price/Performance winner.
This is a far better lens than you'll ever expect for US$300. Far better. Good enough that it stays in my kit for when I want to go light.